Archive for the 'Group dynamics' Category

Why people make weird decisions

What if you’re the crazy one and they’re the sane ones?

Do you find yourself dealing with people who are (from your totally objective, if not god-like, point of view) making short-sighted or irrational decisions? What if their decisions come from where they stand in the organisation/world, rather than from some inherent flaw in their decision-making apparatus?

How to stop people from being so patently freakin’ crazy

1. Put yourself thoroughly in their position – think what information they receive in a timely way and what’s delayed or never reaches them, what they’re rewarded for doing/not doing, what’s visible/invisible to them… In short, work out how the (mad, stupid, loco) decisions they are making are the logical, rational ones to make.

1b If possible, verify your understanding of their situation with them. Find out what’s missing from your model of their model of the situation.

2. Work out what information is obvious to you in your position that they might be missing.

3. See if you can find a way of communicating that missing information to them in a way that is relevant to them.

4. Step back. Breathe. See if anything changes.

Continue reading ‘Why people make weird decisions’

Avoiding Groundhog meetings

Ever feel like you’re having the same meeting again and again?

A system will produce the similar results no matter what the content is.

If we use the same meeting processes, then even if the topic is different, the results will be largely predictable.

Think back to meetings you’ve had recently.

I bet that they were mostly presentations/updates and open discussion (open discussion being unstructured ‘talking things through’).

This is fine for what Sam Kaner, Participatory Decision Making King, calls business-as-usual meetings.

Business-as-usual meetings are for low-impact, relatively inconsequential decisions that have a reasonably clear solution people easily agree to.

However, if you’re dealing with a complex situation, with large potential consequences and no clear solution, the meeting process needs to change. Continue reading ‘Avoiding Groundhog meetings’

Getting situations to shift

What aspect of your life won’t shift despite everyone’s best efforts?

It’s possible that situations are resistant to change because of how we approach them.

A lot of situations that aren’t moving in the direction you’d like have certain factors that work to change the status quo, and other factors that work to maintain the status quo.

First, list the factors that naturally move in the desired direction.
Now,  list the factors that move in the opposite direction.

(If you’ve ever done a Force-Field analysis, this is a similar idea.)

Think of each group of factors as a loop. Continue reading ‘Getting situations to shift’

Teams not herds

Are there simple ways that group meetings can work better?

Recently I’ve been doing a LOT of reading on groups, meetings, teams, dialogue in order to support our expansion into offering meeting facilitation as a service.

I’m a little uncomfortable with process-based ground rules at the minute so here are five principles of good group discussion (especially around problem-solving and decision making).

1. Keep conscious of process

For example, knowing whether you’re in a phase of idea production or idea evaluation can be key.

Continue reading ‘Teams not herds’



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.