Archive for September, 2008

13 reasons why slideshow presentations are stupid and evil

  1. Slideshows perpetuate the idea that a presentation is linear, rather than full of variables

    Talking to people is way less linear than, say, putting a pizza in the oven.

  2. PowerPoint was created by developers and is now ruling the way we communicate

    Whilst I respect IT people to develop IT stuff, I’m staying in charge of my own communication, thank you very much. (Oops, did I just offend my main clients?)

  3. Slideshows perpetuate the idea that you can plan an interaction in detail in advance

    Do you script your conversations? If you do, you’ve read too many 1950s sales books.

  4. Slideshows encourage you to ignore the people in front of you

    Must follow slides. Must. Follow. Slides.

  5. Slideshows encourages performance rather than communication

    And generally bad performance, at that.

  6. Slides make you up the formality of your language, rendering you more difficult to listen to

    Remember: conversational is better.

  7. Slideshows make you think you can deliver other people’s presentations

    You can’t. No really.

  8. Slideshows mean someone else thinks they can write your presentation

    They can’t. No. Really really.

  9. Slideshows encourage recycling of half-examined ideas for what is actually a new audience

    The ‘What slides can a re-use’ or ‘How can I treat people like canned goods’ travesty.

  10. Slideshows make people stand and talk in the dark

    Hello? That’s not just evil. That’s insane.

  11. Slideshows make you feel like when you’ve got the slides ready, you’ve got your talk ready.

    That’s like thinking that because your windscreen is clean, you’re going to have no traffic. Or because your DVDs are in alphabetical order, it’s not going to rain for a week.

  12. Slideshows make you talk in headings and sub-headings

    Yeah, because that works so well in reports, essays and academic documents. Such successful models to copy.

  13. Slideshows mean everyone, all over the world, is delivering the SAME PRESENTATION

    Or at least it makes your listeners feel that way.

Enough with the slideshows already. Enough. ENOUGH!

Anything to add?

Learn to plan for sensible visual aid use with my free e-book ‘Rapid Presentation Planning – be ready with a smart presentation in hours not weeks’ by clicking here. No strings.

Like what you’ve read? Want to keep up-to-date with my rants articles without having to remember to visit this website? Sign up for email updates to have every post arrive straight in your inbox, or subscribe to the RSS feed. If you’re not sure what subscribing entails, click here for my plain English explanation.

Related tirades posts

~ The only book to read about designing PowerPoint slides

~ 3 reasons why you should plan conversations, not presentations

~ 3 reasons why you should deliver your presentation like it’s a conversation

photo courtesy of alice_c

Spending the evening with Murderball champion Mark Zupan

On Saturday I met this guy – Mark Zupan.

He’s the star of a documentary called Murderball about wheelchair rugby or, more officially, Quad Rugby. Quad Rugby is a mean, angry, dangerous testosterone-y sport played by quadraplegics using specially adapted Mad Max style wheelchairs.

Murderball was a documentary made in 2004 about the sport following the USA team to the Athens Olympics. Mark has just come back from the Paralympics in Beijing (that’s the athletic kind, as opposed to the Special Olympics) with a Gold Medal (I got to hold it – inlaid with white jade, doncha know).  NYU Tisch screened the documentary, and then Mark took questions.

Mark’s a cool guy. I learned some things from watching the documentary and then from listening to him talk, including how to be a more interesting person, and how to encourage questions.

Here’s what I learned (see, I even spend my Saturday nights learning things for you. The dedication…)

What I learned from watching the documentary: the importance of story (again)

The documentary follows the formula of a Hollywood movie. By selecting certain events in the lives of the players, there are the goodies, the baddie, romance, sex, the last second tie-breaker games… Quad Rugby is an interesting subject on its own, but getting to know people on a personal level and then being caught up in a story is what makes us tick. Nothing to do with wheelchairs, everything to do with ‘What happens next?’.

In fact, I didn’t ask any questions as all I wanted to ask were ‘story’ questions. Really prying things like: “The movie showed a reconciliation between you and your best friend whose truck you were (unwittingly) thrown from. How are things between you?”

Someone else asked anyway.

What I learned from listening to Mark talk: how to be interesting

Mark is a really interesting guy. Me being me I couldn’t just leave it at that; I started to analyse what makes him interesting. Here’s what I came up with.

Make yourself someone we care about

(I’ve written about this before). Mark took a Q and A session after the screening. He spoke fluently and conversationallly for about 45 minutes, responding to questions naturally. A smart guy with a warm voice, he is able to keep our attention by being someone we feel that, if only we had more time together, we would be friends.

How might you do the same?

  • Be honest
  • Be a little revealing
  • Talk like a normal person

Get us involved in your story

Obviously the documentary did this in a little more detail than you would ordinarily have the time to do but letting us in on your story makes us more involved.

Something that has:

  • a setup
  • some conflicts/obstacles
  • a curiosity-building ending

It’s the only way. Enough bland corporate tofu. More spicy, personal, be-yourself-ness.

You can quote me on that.

What I learned from the Q and A: people need help coming up with questions

Mark cleverly told the audience of film students that they could ask anything they wanted about the process of putting the documentary together. And they did – questions about how the film-makers stopped the process from being intrusive, were some of the reaction shots actually reactions to that event, what was it like being filmed as the subject… I think this is a good thing – setting up the parameters for what people might ask questions about is a good idea. It takes a bit of effort sometimes to come up with something to ask, or to narrow down what you might want to ask. Making it clear what’s ‘in’ and what’s ‘out’ can help, I think.

Like what you’ve read? Want to keep up-to-date with my articles without having to remember to visit this website? Sign up for email updates to have every post arrive straight in your inbox, or subscribe to the RSS feed. If you’re not sure what subscribing entails, click here for my plain English explanation.

Related posts:

~ Making people care about what you’re saying

~ Learning storytelling from movies

~ Telling stories

~ 3 reasons why you should plan conversations, not presentations

Taking Nigella Lawson to bed – learning story telling from how-to writers

via Kaptain Kobold

Despite being 99.95% against scripted presentations (and I’m lying about the .05% to seem fair-minded) I do think we can learn a lot from writers and the practice of writing.

I love how-to books, always have. But bare instruction holds no interest for me. I want to hear the voice of the person talking, and their stories.

I took Nigella Lawson to bed the other night – her cookery books are made to be pored over, not just cooked from. My copy of Domestic Goddess is covered in post-its and scone dough.

Stephanie Pearl-McPhee’s writing about knitting is so good I don’t want to waste it.

Then there’s Randy Halberstadt on jazz piano.

Marilyn Paul on becoming organised.

Brad Warner
on hardcore punk zen.

These are just some that are by my bed right now.

All of them write like they’re in conversation. With me.

All of them tell stories. Continue reading ‘Taking Nigella Lawson to bed – learning story telling from how-to writers’



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.